Parana coffee root-knot nematode - Meloidogyne paranaensis
Effective: August 18, 2010 - December 31, 2013
Taxonomic Position: Tylenchida : Heteroderidae
Pest Type: Nematodes
Pest Code (NAPIS): NEOBQCA
These Approved Methods are appropriate for: 2013, 2012, 2011
Survey
Approved Method(s)
Method |
Detail |
NAPIS Survey Method |
Soil Sample |
Send sample to nematology diagnostic lab where nematodes will be extracted and identified. |
3012 - General Soil Sample |
Tissue Sample |
Collect roots from symptomatic plants. |
3011 - General Tissue Sample |
Survey Recommendations
The following are recommendations for executing the survey using the approved methods for pest surveillance. The recommendations are developed through literature review and consultation with subject matter experts.
Signs: No specific signs are present.
Symptoms: General decline, reduced growth, and dieback of coffee trees are seen. Splitting and cracking of the cortical root tissue, especially the taproot, is observed. Nematode feeding causes the tissues around the giant cells to die. Foliar chlorosis and leaf drop occur.
Key Diagnostic or Identification
Approved Method(s)
ID/Diagnostic: Morphology, coupled with differential host testing, and biochemical methods (esterase and one malate-dehydrogenase phenotypes) have been used to distinguish M. paranaensis as a separate species (Carneiro et al., 1996; Carneiro et al., 2000; Carneiro et al., 2004; Carneiro and Cofcewicz, 2008).
A combination of methods is recommended, because Sipes et al. (2005) found that esterase phenotypes can be polymorphic in coffee root-knot nematodes.
Mistaken Identities: Meloidogyne incognita and M. konaensis.
In Progress / Literature-based Diagnostics: Molecular:
RAPD markers have been used to confirm species identification and for estimating the genetic diversity among species and isolates (Carneiro et al., 2004).
RAPD makers were identified and transformed into SCAR makers and allow the detection of M. exigua, M. incognita, and M. paranaensis in a multiplex PCR (Randig et al., 2002; Randig et al., 2004; Carneiro et al., 2005).