Bacterial leaf streak - Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola
Effective: August 11, 2011
Taxonomic Position: Xanthomonadales : Xanthomonadaceae
Pest Type: Bacteria
Pest Code (NAPIS): FMBVXBN
These Approved Methods are appropriate for: 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012
Survey
Approved Method(s)
Method |
Detail |
NAPIS Survey Method |
Visual |
Collect symptomatic leaf samples. For a preliminary indications of seed infection, look for bacterial streaming (Singh and Rao, 1977). |
3031 - General Visual Observation |
Survey Recommendations
The following are recommendations for executing the survey using the approved methods for pest surveillance. The recommendations are developed through literature review and consultation with subject matter experts.
Signs: Amber colored bacterial exudates on surface of lesions with bacterial leaf streak.
Symptoms: Bacterial leaf streak is seen as narrow, dark-greenish, water-soaked, interveinal streaks of various lengths on the leaf blades. The lesions enlarge and turn yellow orange to brown and coalesce. The lesions then turn grayish white and die.
There are no symptoms on seeds with bacterial leaf streak.
Key Diagnostic or Identification
Approved Method(s)
ID/Diagnostic: 1. Morphological:
Colony morphology: The pathogen is difficult to isolate directly from plant material and seed due to slow growth of bacterium and overgrowth by other organisms. Contaminants may also be of a yellow color (e.g., Pantoea agglomerans and Xanthomonas-like saprophytic bacteria). Isolation from symptomatic material should be completed as soon as possible after collection of samples. Plant parts showing fresh symptoms preferably with bacterial exudates should be selected for isolation if available. See EPPO (2007) for additional detail about pathogen isolation from plant material and seeds.
Isolation of Xanthomonas from symptomatic material can be performed using peptone sucrose agar (PSA), nutrient broth yeast extract medium (NBY), growth factor (GF) agar, modified Wakimoto"s agar (without the ferrous sulfate), and various semi-selective media (Agarwal et al., 1989; Mew and Mistra, 1994; Sakthivel et al., 2001; EPPO, 2007). Growth is very slow on nutrient agar (NA) (EPPO, 2007).
Ming et al. (1991) developed a semi-selective medium, called XOS, to isolate both Xanthomonas oryzae pathovars from rice seed.
Gnanamanickam et al. (1994) tested three strains for growth on TZC, WF-P, YCM, YAT, MXO, and XOS semi-selective media. Results varied for each isolate used, but worked best when using monoclonal antibodies to confirm the genus and pathovar.
2. Serological: An ELISA test is available for Xanthomonas at the genus level for primary screening. A positive does not indicate Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola). The ID must be confirmed by other methods.
Monoclonal antibodies: Genus and pathovar specific antibodies can be used in an ELISA reaction on presumptive positives (Alvarez et al., 1985; Benedict et al., 1989).
Mistaken Identities: In the early stage of disease, the symptoms are similar to narrow brown leaf spot.
At the later stage, when the streaks have coalesced, symptoms of bacterial blight and bacterial leaf streak are similar. The shape of the edges of the lesions differs; straight in leaf streak and wavy in leaf blight.
X. oryzae pv. oryzicola may be distinguished from X. oryzae pv. oryzae by colony morphology in typical isolates, strong starch and gelatin hydrolysis, and by biochemical and molecular methods.
In Progress / Literature-based Diagnostics: Pathogenicity: Isolates can be tested for pathogenicity on susceptible rice cultivars. For X. oryzae pv. oryzicola use 30-45 day old IR24 or IR50 (International Rice Institute) or local popular varieties with known susceptibility to bacterial leaf streak. Leaf clipping and spray inoculation methods are available for inoculations (Kauffman et al., 1973; Cottyn et al., 1994; EPPO, 2007). Nino-Liu et al. (2005) inoculated plants by dipping them in bacterial mixture and incubating in a growth chamber. Symptoms developed a 6-day period.
Xie and Mew (1998) used inoculum that came from seed and leaves sediments that had the bacterium using a washing procedure. The leaves were then placed on water agar and pricked with a needle that was dipped in the tissue sediments.
Fatty Acid Profiles: Fatty acid profiles allow identification at the genus level only (Swings et al., 1990), so this analysis is not recommended a diagnostic method.
Molecular: Leach et al. (1990) used a repetitive DNA sequence (pJEL101) to distinguish X. oryzae pv. oryzae from other pathovars and species of Xanthomonas.
Kang et al. (2008) developed a specific PCR detection system (targets a membrane fusion protein gene) for X. oryzae pv. oryzicola.
Real-time PCR: Zhao et al. (2007) developed a real-time PCR to detect X. oryzae pv. oryzae and can distinguish it from X. oryzae pv. oryzicola.
Liao et al. (2003) developed a real-time PCR that can distinguish the two pathovars.
Computational Genomics/Multiplex PCR: Lang et al. (2010) used a computational genomics pipeline to compare sequenced genomes of Xanthomonas species to identify regions for development of highly specific diagnostic markers. A suite of primers were selected to monitor diverse loci and to distinguish the rice bacterial blight and leaf streak pathogens. A subset of primers were combined into a multiplex PCR to accurately distinguish the two rice pathogens in a geographically diverse collection from other xanthomonads and other plant pathogenic and plant-or seed associated bacteria.